![]() The MS Word icons issue may arise if the Windows or MS Office installation are outdated as it may create incompatibility between the both. Solution 1: Update the Windows and MS Office of Your PC to Their Latest Builds doc files).Docx Files Are not Showing Word Iconīefore moving on to fix the Docx icon, check if uninstalling any other outdated document application (like Adobe Acrobat Reader) sorts out the icons’ problem. The files can be normally opened & edited, but Word icons are not displayed (which work perfectly for the. docx files change to blank/shield icons (not the default MS Word icons). Moreover, outdated or corrupt Office installation may also cause the error under discussion. Hope it's useful for someone.docx file might not show Word icons if the Docx file associations are misconfigured or corrupt. I think only now are we starting to see more middle ground, which is great!Īnyway, just wanted to add a little perspective to the convo. Then we went very far the opposite direction by making things too flat, almost to their detriment. We went to far into making everything textured or 3d. And in the context of User Experience, it generally serves as a signifier for an affordance to the user.īut to your broader point of isn't it interesting how we're moved from 3D to flat and now what appears to a combination of the two absolutely. Skeuomorphic design generally includes design cues inherent to the original work or object, such as giving a paper texture to a digital note to approximate a real world piece of paper. There is definitely room for nuance in this discussion, but in general I just want to point out that it probably isn't really skeuomorphism that we're discussing but rather just 3D, or non-flat iconography. I really like the way this '18 set is going, though: Simple to scan, a pinch of clever abstraction that lets you read as much or as little as you want into it, and finally, for the love of God, some texture. ![]() ![]() '10 comes close, and gets points for style, but goes a bit too far, sacrificing readability. It'd look great on Windows 3 Program Manager, but it's a bit old-looking past that. '03 has slap-you-in-the-face good readability, but is a bit awkward and dated. If anything, I'd just kick up the contrast a smidge, though that could even just be the image here washing it out a bit. The meaningless background shape is a bit of a point against, but railing against pointless supporting shapes in icons is like fighting against the tide. It's simple enough to be at-a-glance readable, but still has some character. I think '07 is the winner out of the past ones ('18 excepted), for me. I don't think it was meant to be a folder, but the fact that the left line of the solid shape matches the right line of the "page" creates the suggestion of a "hinge" or a connection of some sort, which would be in the wrong place if it was the case. It's close enough to a folded-open folder or page that it arguably looks like a badly-done one. Also, the perspective (if it was meant to be perspective) is weird. It's a textbook example, or maybe a cautionary tale, of that dreadfully over-simplistic flat design that was all the rage at the time. Thick monotone lines, a basic "W" splatted down, no variation in the "writing". Personally, I think '13 is the worst of the lot.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |